Re: [LAU] jack + vanilla kernel

From: Leigh Dyer <leigh@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Dec 18 2009 - 07:54:17 EET

Josh Lawrence wrote:
> quick question:
>
> if you are using jack with a vanilla kernel, should you still keep the
> realtime option enabled in jack, or run jack without the -R? my
> reasoning tells me that no realtime patch = no realtime in jack, but I
> just wanted to check myself with you all...

Hi Josh,

Scheduling JACK to run with realtime priority (using the -R option) is
separate to having a kernel that runs with hard realtime pre-emption
enabled. Ideally, you want both, but on a vanilla kernel, you still want
the -R option -- indeed, that's how I run my systems.

One way to think of it is that running with realtime priority (with the
-R option) instructs the kernel to run JACK with the best scheduling it
can possibly manage. If you also have realtime pre-emption in your
kernel, though, then the kernel's best effort will be... well, better :)

Thanks
Leigh
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Dec 18 08:15:02 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 18 2009 - 08:15:03 EET