On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> It would be pretty cool if jack had functions to do the time<->beat
> calculation but sadly most jack developers seem to think that tempo and tempo-
> maps (not even live) do not belong into jack...
i don't agree with this assessment. the reason that tempo information
is not more usefully presented in JACK is that at least at the time
that work on JACK transport was done, we did not feel that there was
any reasonable consensus on how to present a shared tempo map to
applications.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Jan 4 20:15:01 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 04 2010 - 20:15:01 EET