Re: [LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post)

From: Gwenhwyfaer <gwenhwyfaer@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Feb 02 2010 - 15:17:11 EET

On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:31:33 -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic <ico@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Marc, this is a top priority matter. Could you please look into t before
> te end of the day?

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Marc-Olivier Barre wrote:
...
> Deleting the post is not going to happen, I am only willing to censor the
> one post that poses an issue provided the name of the company is mentioned
> on a censor banner inside the post. The least we can do with such a case
> is add a little public humiliation to this.

Why do I get the sense that Marc's response isn't exactly what Ivica
had in mind here...?

*gets popcorn*

(For what it's worth, I believe Marc's made the wrong call here, in
this specific instance.)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Feb 2 16:15:03 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 02 2010 - 16:15:03 EET