Re: [LAU] A sound decision

From: Ray Rashif <schivmeister@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Feb 10 2010 - 01:54:31 EET

On 10 February 2010 05:08, hollunder <hollunder@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Excerpts from fons's message of 2010-02-09 21:52:11 +0100:
>> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 06:26:36PM -0200, A. C. Censi wrote:
>>
>> > Arch Linux system custom 2.6.31,6-rt19 kernel with RT preemption
>>
>> By Archlinux standards you're way behind !
>> Update ! Update ! I have 2.6.32 ! :-) :-)
>>
>> Ciao,
>
> Show me your 2.6.32 rt kernel ;)
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/
>
> But yeah, 2.6.31.12-rt20 is out since a while. There won't be a 2.6.32-rt, next stop is .33

Ahh cmon..these guys do real work, and make the base work for them!
Another guy that comes to mind is Songshop. And most of us with an
Arch system have an old trusty RT kernel, because unlike the rest, we
actually need to do stuff (like production, rather than development).
The distro is really just secondary.

--
GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Feb 10 04:15:01 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 10 2010 - 04:15:01 EET