On 02/17/2010 11:01 AM, Bengt Gördén wrote:
> onsdag 17 februari 2010 05:10:26 skrev Dave Phillips:
>> Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
>>> Agreed, it's not the ideal article. References to sources regarding
>>> Linux audio in general that address JACK might help, if they want
>>> sources not directly related to the topic.
>
>
> Wouldn't your articles in LJ about jack constitute a reliable secondary
> source?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources
fwiw, i've been over that article and deleted both the notability tag
(which was uncalled for to begin with, more a symptom of the general
messiness of that article), and the missing citations tag (after adding
copious amounts)...
however, there are still a number of unverified claims, some even newly
added by yours truly, so a few more secondary sources couldn't hurt.
does anyone know how one starts a new category in wikipedia? i think
that applications list is superfluous, unmaintainable, out-of-date, and
out-of-place. the article would be better served with a new category
"Apps that support JACK" or something, and a link to the category index.
best,
jörn
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Feb 17 16:15:01 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 17 2010 - 16:15:01 EET