Re: [LAU] wikipedia: jack may not meet notability

From: Dave Phillips <dlphillips@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Feb 17 2010 - 16:38:44 EET

Bengt Gördén wrote:
> Wouldn't your articles in LJ about jack constitute a reliable secondary source?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources
>

Hi Bengt,

I'm not sure if these articles meet the criteria, but if anyone's
interested in adding these URLs to the Wikipedia entry, feel free to do so:

    JACK Sync: A Primer For Linux Users -
http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1004080

    Knowing JACK -
http://w3.linux-magazine.com/issue/67/JACK_Audio_Server.pdf

    Computer Music and the Linux Operating System: A Report -
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/014892603322730488

All are out of date to some degree, but they also contain some
still-useful information. The CMJ article includes special mention of JACK.

Best,

dp

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Feb 17 20:15:02 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 17 2010 - 20:15:02 EET