Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?

From: Martin Leese <martin.leese@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Mar 01 2010 - 22:29:02 EET

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Martin Leese
> <martin.leese@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> This is just the old Hafler circuit. It doesn't
>> really compare with Ambisonics.
>
> it doesn't. but i have to say that since i first encountered it,
> thanks to brian eno's noodlings on the cover of, hmm, can't recall,
> but one of the earliest recordings on EG, i've always been struck at
> what a big improvement it makes to an otherwise stereo setup.

Absolutely. I used the Hafler circuit for
18 years, and much preferred it to
two-speaker stereo. (I bought a used
Ambisonic decoder in 1996 or so, and now
much prefer that to the Hafler circuit.)

Regards,
Martin

-- 
Martin J Leese
E-mail: martin.leese  stanfordalumni.org
Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Mar 2 00:15:02 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 02 2010 - 00:15:02 EET