Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling

From: Patrick Shirkey <pshirkey@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Mar 04 2010 - 10:05:28 EET

>
> On 04/03/2010, Dieter Plaetinck<dieter@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>> The fact that they need more then 60k sloc is imho a signal that it's
>> going in the wrong direction. (yes, even counting the gui etc)
>> Much of this is personal preference, but in cases like this I take a
>> simple textbased application over a (bloated) GUI-tool.
>>
> That should not be a problem if and when the session manager is
> working seamlessly behind the scenes.
>
>

60k is hardly bloat when you look at the amount of work and
functionality that has been achieved with LADI so far.

Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Mar 4 12:15:02 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 04 2010 - 12:15:02 EET