Re: [LAU] measuring "average RMS"

From: Folderol <folderol@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Mar 17 2010 - 18:31:38 EET

On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:16:57 +0100
fons@kokkinizita.net wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:09:31AM +0100, Atte André Jensen wrote:
> > becks wrote:
> >
> > > $ normalize-audio -n yourfile.wav
>
> Note that the result is *not* the 'average RMS' level
> but the maximum RMS over any 1 second period.
>
> It's an indication of the maximum volume, not the
> average one. If you just take the slice of one sec
> that produced the maximum and replace the rest by
> silence you get the same value.
>
> Ciao,
>
Always gets messy when you say average and RMS in the same sentence :)

-- 
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Mar 17 20:15:02 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 17 2010 - 20:15:03 EET