On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 23:41 -1000, david wrote:
> rosea.grammostola wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 23:34 -1000, david wrote:
> >> Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> >>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >>>> This musing about "broken" alsa-drivers that need to be "fixed" in the
> >>>> thread at PA increases the bad feeling about PA's relation and awarenes
> >>>> to pro-audio.
> >>>>
> >>>> best regs
> >>>> HZN
> >>> PA is specifically for 'desktop' usage, pro-audio isn't a part of
> >>> that. If you're doing pro-audio you'd be running JACK anyway. I
> >>> struggle to understand why a user would want PA, with all the inherent
> >>> latency concerns (compared to JACK) to control their pro-audio
> >>> soundcard.
> >> Perhaps Pulse really just wants to get rid of JACK in the first place?
> >
> > ???
>
> Replace JACK entirely with Pulse, become the only audio server game in
> town? ;-)
>
Paranoid? ;)
No, here Pulse nicely suspends when I start qjackctl and not vice
versa... Jack rules here ;)
\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon May 10 16:15:03 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 10 2010 - 16:15:03 EEST