Re: [LAU] I just don't know Jack anymore.

From: david <gnome@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Jun 03 2010 - 12:49:01 EEST

Brent Busby wrote:
> I'm updating packages on a studio machine that's been fairly stable with
> Jack 0.116.2, just to catch up with what's been going on. Jack's been
> up to all kinds of stuff since then though.
>
> There's Jack with DBus, Jack without DBus, Jack that does realtime by
> default, Jack that needs '-R' for realtime, Jack specialized for
> multiple processors, Jack that runs on multiple processors but isn't
> specialized for it...there's probably a plain old Jack somewhere too.
>
> I know Jack's been a busy guy, and all work and no play make Jack a dull
> boy, but all these choices and options are enough to make someone go get
> a bottle of Jack and get jacked up just thinking about it.
>
> I'm running Gentoo with the Pro-Audio overlay, and it looks like there
> are versions from both the 0.x and 1.x series available. What's
> recommended these days for someone with four AMD cores, RME hardware
> (via PCI-E, no firewire), and has always worked fine with the 0.x series
> even on SMP? (And I have no PulseAudio, and don't plan on getting any.)

I don't know all those details. JackDMP 1.9.x works here where I
couldn't get JACK 0.116 to work. But I've only got lowly single-core
processors here.

-- 
David
gnome@email-addr-hidden
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Jun 3 16:15:01 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 03 2010 - 16:15:01 EEST