Re: [LAU] No batch processing on Linux?

From: Chris Cannam <cannam@email-addr-hidden-day-breakfast.com>
Date: Fri Sep 24 2010 - 23:49:25 EEST

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Bernardo Barros
<bernardobarros2@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> also python scripts, right? :-)

Not so much. Perl is far more trustworthy than Python 2.x when it
comes to strange encodings -- Python's troubles with multi-byte
character encodings are well known and the scale of change involved to
fix them is one of the main reasons for the general shift to Python 3
being so slow. Nobody gets filename encodings right first time in a
Python 2 program.

Perl switched to Unicode strings in a minor release (5.6, a decade
ago), in a way that does the right thing so well as to be practically
magic.

Disclaimer: though I'm fond of Perl, I wouldn't really go for writing
anything big in it if you ever want to read it again. Python is much
more maintainer-friendly. In this particular case, though, Perl is
very impressive.

Chris
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Sep 25 12:15:04 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 25 2010 - 12:15:05 EEST