Re: [LAU] Even more netjack trouble (although setup seems as described)

In Sep 28 A.D. 2010 Jörn Nettingsmeier scripsit:

> On 09/28/2010 12:30 PM, Julien Claassen wrote:
>> Hello Jörn!
>> So no matter if he initiates the connection, he will also need the
>> correct ports forwarded from his router?
>
> UDP is stateless, and there is no concept of "initiating a connection" on the
> network layer. you basically send a UDP packet and hope it makes it. the
> opposite end does the same.
>
> so say we have this setup:
>
> machine A: 192.168.0.2/24
> router A: internal address 192.168.0.1/24, external address x.x.x.x
> internet
> router B: internal address 192.168.0.1/24, external address y.y.y.y
> machine B: 192.168.0.2/24
>
> router A must listen to the UDP port you want to use and forward each packet
> to machine A.
> router B must listen to the same port and forward to machine B.
>
>
> say you're A. your partner host will then be y.y.y.y, i.e. the router. since
> it's forwarding, you will be in effect talking to machine B.
> same rules apply for the other direction.
>
> it's advisable to run a testing tool for udp connections before you try
> netjack. i recommend iperf, it's text-mode and available at sourceforge iirc.
   Thank you very much. We'll do that and test netjack again. I think we will
have more luck this time. :-)
   Warm regards
          Julien

>
>
>
>
>

--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)

======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Sep 28 16:15:04 2010