Re: [LAU] OT: 64 vs 32 bit?

From: Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Sep 28 2010 - 18:58:00 EEST

I'm on fedora 13 64-bit. I can report that the recent flash works ok here.

2010/9/28 Paul Davis <paul@linuxaudiosystems.com>:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Arve Barsnes <arve.barsnes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:10 PM, david <gnome@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>>> Josh Lawrence wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is there no flash plugin for mozilla?
>>>>
>>>> No. If you really need to access such webpages, install mozilla and
>>>> flashplugin-nonfree in your 386 chroot and use the 32bit browser to
>>>> access the sites.
>>>>
>>>> I watch a lot of YouTube, and I've been missing Flash on my 64 bit
>>>> machine.  Thanks for suggesting the 32 bit chroot.
>>>
>>> And I think someone on the list recently mentioned that 64-bit Flash for
>>> Linux is out now?
>>
>> It has been available for a long time, I've been using it for a year
>> or more, it was just unavailable lately for a period of a few months.
>
> i found the prior version(s) very unstable on my x86_64 fedora box. i
> just installed the new version from adobe yesterday, and can't yet say
> if its actually usable.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Sep 28 20:15:09 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 28 2010 - 20:15:09 EEST