[LAU] Implications of kernel without BKL for RT/Low latency ?

From: Fritz Meissner <meissner.fritz@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Nov 02 2010 - 13:52:25 EET

I noticed this announcement of kernel 2.6.37-rc1
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/1/82 , and in particular that the BKL is
largely gone. To my (fairly uninformed) mind, it sounds as though
taking the lock out of the kernel should make the kernel more
responsive and maybe make the RT or low-latency kernel easier to do,
or even unnecessary maybe ? I'd be interested to hear the comments on
this from our experts.

Fritz
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Nov 2 16:15:02 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 02 2010 - 16:15:02 EET