On 15 November 2010 15:11, Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
...
> LV2 represents some kind of version of the community's best-effort
> attempt to define a better plugin API. It is hard to explain why LV2
> is so superior because its rooted in a feature that actually makes it
> quite annoying for anyone who isn't instantly convinced that endless
> extensibility is the right goal. But it allows for more or less
> anything, assuming that both parties (the plugin and the host) can
> agree on it.
I followed you up to this paragraph. LADSPA started it, DSSI improved
on it, and LV2 tried to be the end-all-be-all (the final solution) if
I'm understanding correctly. Oh, and VAMP is sort of a side-show
freak. But can you explain what you mean here, "assuming that both
parties can agree on it"?
-- Christopher "Chip" Van Dan http://www.van-dan.com _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Tue Nov 16 00:15:03 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 16 2010 - 00:15:03 EET