Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?

From: Fabio <capoeirista@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Nov 18 2010 - 23:28:04 EET

Em quinta-feira 18 novembro 2010, ās 18:37:30, fons@email-addr-hidden escreveu:

> For these tests the authors used 'audiophile' DVD-A recordings
> (mostly classical music and jazz IIRC), all of them 24-bit, 96
> or or 192 kHz, and had the listeners compare them to a version
> transcoded to CD standards (44.1 kHz, 16 bit). Two results
> emerged from this:
>
> 1. Nobody could hear any difference between the original recordings,
> reproduced using the best equipment available, and the transcoded
> versions.
>
> 2. Almost all listeners preferred the 'audiophile' recordings to
> other versions of the same music released on CD.

well, you sure loose quality downsampling to 16bit, that's what they heard

they should have made the test only with diferent samplerates.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Nov 19 00:15:04 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 19 2010 - 00:15:04 EET