Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?

From: <fons@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Nov 19 2010 - 00:05:27 EET

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 07:28:04PM -0200, Fabio wrote:
> Em quinta-feira 18 novembro 2010, ās 18:37:30, fons@email-addr-hidden escreveu:
>
> > For these tests the authors used 'audiophile' DVD-A recordings
> > (mostly classical music and jazz IIRC), all of them 24-bit, 96
> > or or 192 kHz, and had the listeners compare them to a version
> > transcoded to CD standards (44.1 kHz, 16 bit). Two results
> > emerged from this:
> >
> > 1. Nobody could hear any difference between the original recordings,
> > reproduced using the best equipment available, and the transcoded
> > versions.
> >
> > 2. Almost all listeners preferred the 'audiophile' recordings to
> > other versions of the same music released on CD.
>
> well, you sure loose quality downsampling to 16bit, that's what they heard

On the contrary, the test showed that the listeners could *not* hear
the difference.

Ciao,

-- 
FA
There are three of them, and Alleline.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Nov 19 00:15:05 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 19 2010 - 00:15:05 EET