Re: [LAU] Sampling rate and perceived audio quality [WAS]: Re: edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?

Thanks for that paper. I also like to know about papers like this for
some kind of audio discussions.

2010/11/22, Lorenzo Sutton <lsutton@email-addr-hidden>:
> A. C. Censi wrote:
>> There is a pdf copy available online, found thru google:
>> http://c.wrzuta.pl/wo8536/848633c40022f8f4499160b0/0/jaes_v55_9_pg775.pdf
>>
>> Best
>>
>> A C Censi
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:19 PM,<fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:19:19AM +0100, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do you have the reference for this paper? I can't seem to find that
>>>> exact report through google.
>>> This the reference in the AES library:
>>>
>>> <http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=14195>
>>>
>>> Ciao,
>>>
> Great! Thanks to both for the pointers.
>
> Lorenzo
>>> --
>>> FA
>>>
>>> There are three of them, and Alleline.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux-audio-user mailing list
>>> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
>>> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>

-- 
Carlos sanchiavedraz
* Musix GNU+Linux
  http://www.musix.es
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user