Re: [LAU] questions about limits.conf

From: Folderol <folderol@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Dec 12 2010 - 17:25:54 EET

On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:10:29 -0500
Dave Phillips <dlphillips@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> Trying to hammer down the current recommendations for the limits.conf
> file. Ardour advises that 'memlock unlimited' is a bad idea, but what's
> the formula for setting that value ?
>
> Also, is the 'nice' line still needed ? If so, is there an optimal value ?
>
> TIA,
>
> dp

My understanding is that Nice has been unnecessary for some time. Also, a lot
of distros are moving away from the use of limits.conf - don't know what they
use instead, just that my latest (squeeze) install asked me if I wanted it to
set up audio when I installed qjackctl and a lot of other audio stuff. I said
yes, and it did everything for me!

-- 
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Dec 12 20:15:04 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 12 2010 - 20:15:04 EET