fons@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 09:17:24AM -0500, Dave Phillips wrote:
>
>
>> Honestly, did the designers of the Arch script confer with PD before
>> they made the decision to release the script ? It seems to me that
>> it would have been the civil thing to do. They can't have been
>> unaware of Paul's previous statements regarding A3's distribution,
>> or am I wrong about that ?
>>
>
> The package contains 3 files:
>
> ...
> If you care to read it ...
I had read it, and I agree, it does what I do anyway.
> If the intention is that _nobody_ should do this, then access
> to the code should be controlled. In the other case, it doesn't
> matter if people do it using the PKGBUILD or manually. If you
> want to bash Arch users for using this package, at least be
> consistent and bash everyone building ardour3.
>
Fair enough.
@Fabio :
You wrote
"I know that it will taste better if i wait. But,,,,,,,,,, I have to eat
from it...."
:))
You're right, appetite is one of the great stimulators.
Best,
dp
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Dec 22 00:15:01 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 22 2010 - 00:15:02 EET