On 12/25/2010 12:49 PM, fons@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 05:31:59PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
>
>> in a presentation i heard recently, the presenter played a metallica
>> single, in direct comparison to pink noise at full scale. the metallica
>> mix was significantly louder. go figure...
>
> That's cheating. Pink (or any color) noise doesn't have a defined
> peak/RMS ratio. If it's Gaussian its peak value is unlimited.
true. the fun thing was you could see his slide announcing the next demo
snippets. imagine reading this:
1. peak-normalized metallica single
2. pink noise at full scale
now when you frequently use your average run-of-the-mill pink noise
generator at -20dBFS to test speaker arrays, you do have a gut feeling
of how "loud" pink noise is. in fact, for reasonable time windows,
you're pretty likely to get an average loudness - with JAPA's pink noise
generator for instance, the loudness osciallates around a mean value
such that if your meter integrates for longer than, say, a second, the
reading will be pretty much constant.
so the second line was enough to make me cringe and grope for my ear
plugs. so it was quite a laugh when the perceived loudness was a lot
lower than for the first example.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Dec 25 16:15:04 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Dec 25 2010 - 16:15:05 EET