It seems like you would want to do normal compression with a very low
threshold (about the noise level) and a negative ratio.
then you end up with a curve like
\
/ \
/ \
Then you can add that into your original signal, to get something
approximating "upward compression".
Also, perhaps the expander from tap-plugins might do what you want:
http://tap-plugins.sourceforge.net/ladspa/dynamics.html
<http://tap-plugins.sourceforge.net/ladspa/dynamics.html>Jeremy
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Fabio <capoeirista@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Em Sat, 25 Dec 2010 17:09:54 +0000
> Q <lists@email-addr-hidden> escreveu:
>
> > upwards compression does it by boosting the volume of the quietest
> > signals -- compressing from the bottom up. This parallel processing
> > produces upwards compression as Joern expounded on my original
> > statement
>
> ok, thats what i want
>
> perhaps my math is to weak...lol
>
> I simply will try it out.
>
> just giving more info: amateur-singer, half an hour of time, lives long
> from here. we recorded her voice, but in the lower parts she sang very
> quiet, so with normal compression i would compress 95% of what is
> correct only to add more gain to those parts. so i thought about this
> option instead. probably i should simply elevate volume in those part
> instead.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Dec 26 00:15:02 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 26 2010 - 00:15:02 EET