Re: [LAU] rt kernel in debian/squeeze

From: rosea.grammostola <rosea.grammostola@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Jan 07 2011 - 22:44:04 EET

On 01/07/2011 09:34 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
> On 01/07/2011 09:22 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
>> On 01/07/2011 09:15 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
>>> Hi Jeremy,
>>>
>>> On 01/07/2011 08:56 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
>>>> On 01/07/2011 08:14 PM, Josh Lawrence wrote:
>>>>> in addition to Robin's suggestions, I'll add one more to the mix:
>>>>> AVLinux uses this kernel, I dunno if it is a true -rt kernel, but my
>>>>> results have been very positive:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://liquorix.net/
>>>>>
>>>>> ymmv. my initial reaction would be to trust the 64 studio kernel over
>>>>> all of the suggestions, just b/c they are familiar with the linux
>>>>> audio landscape.
>>>> The liquorix kernel is not a RT kernel. And I tried the 64 Studio
>>>> kernel, had to change the apt line though:
>>>>
>>>> deb http://apt.64studio.com/backports squeeze-backports main contrib
>>>> non-free
>> Is there also a 64studio RT kernel for Lucid?
> No, although there's some minor effort for Maverick.
>
> Previously we did -rt kernel packages for i386, i686 and amd64.
> Currently we're focusing on amd64 and squeeze only. That may change
> again in the not-too-distant future once 2.6.37-rt is out.
>
> Depending on pengutronix' config for 2.6.37-rt we may also just join
> Uwe Kleine-König's endeavour.
Ok, I'm interested in your view about that kernel.

Is it good practice to install a debian kernel for Lucid?

\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Jan 8 00:15:07 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 08 2011 - 00:15:07 EET