On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 03:38:48PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> don't forget the most important aspect of mastering: a second pair
> of ears, in a very good listening room.
Correct.
> take that out of the equation, and all that's left of mastering is
> some parametric eq and (if you must) multiband compression.
And I wonder why these shouldn't be done when mixing instead.
In the 'old days' EQ and compression was required to adapt a
mix to the limits of the distribution medium (vinyl in most
cases). No such problem exists today. Why on earth should you
re-EQ a mix ? If the mixing engineer did a good job (by carefully
EQ-ing individual tracks), what chance do you have to improve this
by acting on the mixed signal ? If he didn't, the way to correct
for this is to redo the mix. Same for compression, it's much more
effective and less intrusive when done on single tracks.
Ciao,
-- FA There are three of them, and Alleline. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Tue Jan 18 00:15:07 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 18 2011 - 00:15:07 EET