Re: [LAU] State of the art GUI

From: Ray Rashif <schivmeister@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Jan 28 2011 - 17:00:46 EET

On 28 January 2011 20:10, <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 07:27:55AM +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>
>> Speaking of pretty interfaces, both MusE and OOM2 need a revamp. OOM2
>> is a step in the right direction, but it's still in late 90s (as well
>> as way too many other apps). Sadly, there is only one Thorsten Wilms,
>> and whoever did Wired is not around anymore. IMO, only Calf from Git
>> has state of the art UI today, with Ardour 3 next to it and Rosegarden
>> trotting along.
>
> I'd be interested to know what, in your opinion, makes a GUI 'state
> of the art' as opposed 'late 90s'. In other words, a list of features,
> properties etc. as opposed to just an example to look at.
>
> P.S. I'm not trolling. I really want to know.

To me, it should be shiny. Like this: http://www.libnui.net/

:P

--
GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Jan 28 20:15:03 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 28 2011 - 20:15:03 EET