On 04/04/2011 04:14 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>
>
>> So just to make sure I am correct here... All nuclear weapons require an
>> assisted explosion?
>>
> Yes, you need both high heat and high pressure to force the fissile
> material into the required chain reaction.
>
>
So, just having enough Pu-239 in one location is definitely,
categorically not going to be able to cause a nuclear explosion? Not
even a little one that might cause a rapid escalation?
>> It's categorically impossible for Plutonium-239 to
>> become critical without assistance from an explosion of some other fuel
>> or high energy source?
>>
>> You don't have super heated Pu-239 actively being created in a semi
>> critical chain reaction. If it gets unstable there is not enough neutron
>> flux to make baby go boom.
>>
> As explained here:
>
> https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Criticality_accident
>
>
Gotta love wikipedia. Instant truth just add complement set ;-)
> there have been a number of criticality accidents, but they always
> create so much heat that the fissile material expands and the conditions
> cease to be critical.
>
>
So far so good, nuclear physics being of course entirely understood and
modelled and no gaps exist is current knowledge of the fundamental
processes involved :-)
-- Patrick Shirkey Boost Hardware Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Mon Apr 4 12:15:02 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 04 2011 - 12:15:03 EEST