Robin Paulson wrote:
> On 16 May 2011 03:17, Lorenzo Sutton <lsutton@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>>> One important point for me was to have jack1 packages not jack2. The
>>>> latter wouldn't be picked up by the ./configure script and in turn there
>>>> would be no jack.
>>> hmm, that's kind of important for me. is there a jack1 compatibility
>>> wrapper or similar?
>> Good question. I've noticed for some application that compiling with
>> jack1 and then running with jack2 works fine. But I guess it's more of a
>> jack-dev question
>
> can anyone answer this? given that linuxsampler relies on jack1, is it
> able to use jack2? is it only a matter of forcing the dependencies? or
> does ls need to be changed at the code level?
>
> alternatively, are there any wrappers which allow jack1 applications
> to use jack2?
Hmmm, I use JACK2 and haven't met any JACK1 apps that didn't work with
it, but I don't really do a lot of JACK apps if your talking about
things like JACK Rack, etc. And I don't have linuxsampler around. I
thought one of the folk on the list used linuxsampler with JACK for
their live sound?
-- David gnome@email-addr-hidden authenticity, honesty, community _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Tue May 17 16:15:02 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 17 2011 - 16:15:02 EEST