Re: [LAU] Made with GNU/Linux: 3m171a

From: Diego Simak <diego.simak@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Jun 13 2011 - 16:21:47 EEST

Thank you very much David,
I will really consider your comments, 100% agree that the bass should
be more present (among other things) and the drums should be improved
also.

I really want to thank all of you for your comments.
That's what exactly what I was looking for.

Diego

2011/6/12 David Adler <david.jo.adler@email-addr-hidden>:
> Hi Diego,
>
> Thanks for posting this. While agreeing with Attes comment, I do really like it.
>
> The panned hi hats would sound more spatial if they weren't panned
> totally left/right.
>
> Until about 1:18, the base sounds so cheap and choppy (as Julian
> said). Maybe a bit of decay and release would improve it. After the
> said time this becomes less annoying since the base merges with the
> rest, and the nice part begins (glad I was patient enough to listen
> through this first minute).
>
> I would not add compression except for the very low end, to push it
> somewhat up. It seems to be the case that electronic music I regard as
> well produced often looks over-compressed in waveform display, until
> you zoom in and discover that it is just the fundamental bass
> frequency periodically using up most of the dynamic range. Behind a
> ~80Hz high-pass filter, dynamics often well exceed the k14 range in
> jkmeter.
> The very opposite of californication-style compression, in that the
> result requires good playback systems.
>
> Just a laymans taste, have fun producing!
>
>
> best,
> d
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Jun 13 20:15:02 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 13 2011 - 20:15:02 EEST