[LAU] Kernel 2.6.39

From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net>
Date: Tue Jun 21 2011 - 22:03:08 EEST

Hi,

could there be any disadvantages for averaged desktop users, server
usage etc., if the kernel 2.6.39 is build as PREEMPT kernel?

Today I installed the kernel from the repositories of a major Distro:

$ uname -a
Linux debian 2.6.39-2-amd64 #1 SMP Wed Jun 8 11:01:04 UTC 2011 x86_64
GNU/Linux

Some time ago I build the kernel myself:

$ uname -a
Linux debian 2.6.39.1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jun 7 01:40:05 CEST 2011 x86_64
GNU/Linux

I'm asking, because I want to know, if it would be reasonable to appeal,
that major distros should build it as PREEMPT kernel.

Regards,

Ralf

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Jun 22 00:15:01 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 22 2011 - 00:15:02 EEST