Re: [LAU] Gnome-shell | Unity

From: Joe Hartley <jh@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Jun 26 2011 - 21:23:28 EEST

On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:06:40 +0200
rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On 06/26/2011 02:54 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> > The downside for OpenBox (not xmonad) is that it seems not very
> > actively developed in the last year or so, not much releases or even
> > git commits.
> You could try Fluxbox instead. That project is still pretty active afaik.

Fluxbox is Openbox's successor and is still in very active development.
I like it a lot and use it on all my machines, not just the studio
machine. I've never had a problem running either gnome or kde apps
under it.

-- 
======================================================================
       Joe Hartley - UNIX/network Consultant - jh@email-addr-hidden
 Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Jun 27 00:15:01 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 27 2011 - 00:15:02 EEST