Re: [LAU] Petri-Foo preview release: 0.0.2

From: Renato <rennabh@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Jul 02 2011 - 19:27:51 EEST

On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 17:16:28 +0100
James Morris <jwm.art.net@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> the problem though, is that petri-foo still doesn't allow layering of
> samples within a patch. so say you setup five patches with five
> samples to be in five overlapping velocity ranges. that's five
> different patches. you don't want five patches, you want to achieve
> the illusion of one patch - ie you probably want to achieve the
> illusion of a single musical instrument as realistically as possible.
> so if you adjust one patch, you probably also need to adjust the other
> four also which could rapidly get out of hand.
>
> i really don't see or desire for petri-foo to be a sampler to be used
> for realism. you'd be much better served by linux sampler if realism
> is what you're looking to create.
>

I see that, and I think it's allright; if achieving this thing, which
isn't one of the goals of the project, means bringing major changes to
it, I agree it doesn't make much sense. There is indeed other software
meant to do it - ATM I'm using hydrogen.

thank you for the talk :)

cheers
renato
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Jul 2 20:15:03 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jul 02 2011 - 20:15:03 EEST