Re: [LAU] Reply to

On 09/08/2011, Thorsten Wilms <t_w_@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 09:50 PM, Gwenhwyfaer wrote:
>> If you want to reply
>> to list, reply-to-all does it,
>
> Reply-to-all gets the original senders address from where?

Same place as reply-to gets it, I should imagine. (I can't shake the
feeling that you didn't think this question through.)

> Oh, and receiving mail with both a list and my address in recipients as
> result of a reply-to-all sucks, as it screws up filtering.

Oh. So my broken client is a problem that mustn't be worked around in
order to force a change, but your broken client is something that must
always be catered for by everyone else? There's a word for that kind
of thinking.

On the other hand, perhaps I shouldn't expect logic from someone who
attacks the one bit of a critical email which is basically in
agreement with them...
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Aug 10 12:15:01 2011