On 08/13/2011 09:03 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:56 PM, rosea grammostola
> <rosea.grammostola@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> On 08/13/2011 08:54 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:46 PM, rosea grammostola
>>> <rosea.grammostola@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Makes me wondering, is this tool doing anything 'nasty' in the view of
>>>> JackSession developers, for either apps with or without state?
>>> its only useful for clients with no state. clients with state will not
>>> work correctly with it and are not intended to be used with it.
>> Thanks. Could you explain a bit more e.g. why doesn't it work correctly with
>> clients with state and what's going wrong in practice?
> all it does is to record the command that it started, and when told to
> restart, it uses that same command again. so, if the command involved
> a client that really did have state, the client would not get to save
> its state or restore it. this is why you can use it, for example, to
> include a non-JACK application in a jack session.
Ok, so the problem is that JackSession starts and stops the 'wrapped'
JACK app, but doesn't save the state of it (and doesn't give you a warning).
\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Aug 14 00:15:03 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 14 2011 - 00:15:03 EEST