Re: [LAU] Linux-audio-user Digest, Vol 55, Issue 12

From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net>
Date: Fri Sep 16 2011 - 19:28:56 EEST

On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 12:00 +0000,
linux-audio-user-request@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> Message: 17
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 05:02:47 +0100 (CET)
> From: Julien Claassen <julien@email-addr-hidden-lab.de>
> Subject: Re: [LAU] cpufreqd and no effect?
> To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden>
> Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1111110454470.27859@email-addr-hidden>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Hello everyone!
> Soory to harp on about it. But now cpufreqd is running and says,
> that it
> loaded the extra module powernow-k8 and it runs, ps -ax shows that.
> But I have
> no effect. /proc/cpuinfo always says 3000.0mHz. Find below my
> cpufreqd.conf,
> only special thing I did was to change the program based scheduling.
> Here's
> lsmod output:
> # lsmod
> Module Size Used by cpufreq_userspace 1488 0
> cpufreq_conservative 7644 0 cpufreq_powersave 618 0
>
> Kernel version is 2.6.38 (self-compiled)
> Distro: Debian (Squeeze)
> So what have I done wrong? I want my normal system to run at
> 800.0mHz, I
> know, that it can do it, it did before cpufreqd started working. I
> only
> want/need the full power, when heavy sound processing is in work.
> Where did I
> behave foolishly here?
> Warmly yours
> Julien
> *** /etc/cpufreqd.conf

I don't have got that file for my Debian. I'm in a hurry now, I'll read
the following LAU Digest and if needed I'll reply to this topic within
the next days. If your 3.1GHz CPU did run with 0.8GHz, freq scaling
already was running.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Sep 16 20:15:01 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 16 2011 - 20:15:02 EEST