On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:38:51PM +0000, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:42:05PM +0400, Artem Vakhitov wrote:
> > On 22.09.2011 23:16, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> >> If you need not only the timing but also to control volume
> >> then it's unlikely this can be done without delay. The part
> >> of the input that would contain usable information to control
> >> volume would very probably come after the trigger, but to
> >> play the sample you need both. The only solution then is to
> >> delay the trigger. That means that simple solutions such as
> >> the ladspa plugin can't do what you want.
> >
> > The thing is, I do not need to do that in any kind of real time. It
> > would be sufficient to feed a "beat box" .wav file at the input and get
> > the corresponding .wav or .mid file at the output. All digital
> > processing can be done fully off-line, so all timing and amplitude info
> > is there in advance.
>
> Even if it hasn't to work in real time Pd is probably the
> ideal tool to prototype such a system. The alternative
Just idle curiosity, but why do you guys recommend PD over SC or csound?
I had the idea they were more or less equally suited.
Cheers,
S.M.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Sep 23 08:15:02 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 23 2011 - 08:15:02 EEST