Re: [LAU] VC and jack

On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 03:45:31PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> hint: the patch to add a new port type to JACK will involve on the
>> same order of magnitude number of characters as have already been used
>> in this email thread.
>
> Indeed. But why should anyone submit a patch for an idea that
> has already been rejected, in particular if the rejection was
> motivated in a way that implicitly condones crappy programming
> instead of criticizing it ? What sort of excellence can you
> expect if things are decided in that way ? (1)

it wasn't rejected.

> Don't take this personally, but I've had enough of this sort
> of negative argumentation for some time. I do remember the LV2
> discussions (2), the Jack session ones, and some others. And
> the result is that I go my own way, even if that leads to a
> loss of synergy and benefit for all.

fair enough.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Sep 26 00:15:03 2011