On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Am 06.10.2011 16:27, schrieb Rui Nuno Capela:
>> On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:46:29 +0400, Louigi Verona
>> <louigi.verona@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>> Hey Rui!
>>> Thanks a lot for implementing the clip thing - I remember asking for
>>> that myself a long time ago )
>>
>> question is, does it work now as you asked/wanted back then?
>
> As far as I am concerned I see it as a remarkable improvement. It brings
> some of the virtues of a loop-oriented sequencer I sometimes missed in
> Qtractor.
>
> To detach a clip from its siblings by giving it a new name makes perfect
> sense to me still.... it would be nice to have some automatism that simply
> iterates the filename. Some people feel a disturbance in the force, if they
> have to switch from editing notes in a pianoroll to typing filenames ;-)
Yes yes yes. This is the worst "feature" of QTractor. I don't give a
$%^& what the filename of an individual clip is, and I don't want to
be interrupted to think about where on disk the file should be stored.
Stash it in a per-session directory, or a "clip library" or whatever.
Don't make me think about that mess I call my home directory.
DISCLAIMER: I haven't used qtractor in a while; I assume it still
works this way. If not, someone tell me to shut up.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Oct 8 16:15:03 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 08 2011 - 16:15:03 EEST