Re: [LAU] Linuxsampler/qsampler usability and session portability

From: Alexandre Prokoudine <alexandre.prokoudine@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Oct 15 2011 - 15:59:05 EEST

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:

> linuxsampler front-ends like qsampler only "talks" lscp, they don't know
> nothing about jack, midi nor sound-files, whatsoever. it is linuxsampler
> that does all the dirty work, even if its being redirected via its plugin
> interface.
>
> however, linuxsampler as an engine does not provide any interface to edit
> sample files be that .gig or .sfz . you edit those files through an
> appropriate stand-alone application (eg. gigedit) and then tell linuxsampler
> to load the product into its engine. that's it.

Well, I guess the initial question was more in the lines of "why do we
make it so difficult to create sample libraries?" :)

I gave gigedit a go a while ago to try creating a sample library from
public domain files I stumbled upon, but eventually gave up, because
even after doing it by the book I couldn't get any sound of
gigedit/LS.

Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Oct 15 16:15:02 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 15 2011 - 16:15:02 EEST