Re: [LAU] Top DSP plugins?

From: Jeremy Jongepier <jeremy@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Oct 19 2011 - 15:53:54 EEST

On 10/19/2011 02:44 PM, Brett McCoy wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 19 October 2011 11:23:09 Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
>>> On 10/19/2011 10:52 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>>> +1, regarding to Jamin is good and it does work without pumping.
>>>
>>> I'm not so fond of JAMin. It has flaws and consumes way too much CPU.
>>> About a year ago Patrick Shirkey mentioned that there was no other JACK
>>> application that attempts to provide a complete mastering chain. But
>>> that was about a year ago, at the moment it is perfectly possible to
>>> create a similar tool chain with the help of plug-ins. I prefer plug-ins
>>> then, more flexible.
>>
>> Completely rebuilding Jamin with single plugins will consume even more cpu
>> than jamin itself. The reason is that jamin is actually built from plugins
>> (the look-ahead and the compressors are plugins) but also merges plugins
>> internally to optimize for speed...
>>
>
> I haven't had issues per se with CPU resources (whern I am using Jamin, I am
> not doing anything else except recording the output), but what are the
> alleged flaws in Jamin?
>

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2010-May/069653.html

I think it was explained in another thread but as I am no DSP expert I
could be wrong. This was the other thread:
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2010-September/072897.html

Sorry to dig this up and maybe I shouldn't say flaws, I guess it's about
different interpretations on how filtering is done.

Best,

Jeremy
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Oct 19 16:15:02 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 19 2011 - 16:15:02 EEST