Re: [LAU] Top DSP plugins?

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:02:44PM +0200, Philipp ??berbacher wrote:
> Excerpts from S. Massy's message of 2011-10-19 21:09:36 +0200:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:31:48AM +0200, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> > >
> > > It's interesting that in the 70's (the last half for me) and 80's, we did not
> > > have much possibilities compared to what we have today, we had to stick to
> > > what we had. But the sound itself and the mixes could sound very good. Much of
> > > what's typical of the sound from the 70's and 80's was not about quality but
> > > sound preferences, well expect for noise, echo and other tape and HW
> > > artifacts.
> > It's also interesting to note that, with the plethora of devices,
> > plugins and general techniques available today, mmusic production seems
> > to be sonically convergent. IOW, back when people had less freedom in
> > terms of choice, they fought harder to create a production sound
> > specific to them, while today, that self-same freedom seems to be used
> > to mimic one another as much as possible. (This is speaking broadly, of
> > course.)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > S.M.
>
> The question is, what can you do except mimic each other? Where can you
> go where no-one has gone before?
That's one way, or you can build on what has been done by others,
picking up where they left. Being influenced, even strongly so, is still
a far cry from attempting to recreate more or less exactly what others
have done.

> I think I heard an anecdote once that Mozart (or another big classical
> composers) wondered about the same thing, yet a lot stuff happened
> since. The only possible way to go is into experimental music, and even
> there it's very hard to do something no-one has done before. The added
> downside is that nearly no-one will want to listen to experimental
> music (based on the principle of pop music, people like what's similar
> to what they know and like). I think many people have run into this
> problem and I believe that's where the (from my observation) increasing
> trend of combining different kinds media comes from.
>
> In at least the time I could observe them many musicians fell into two
> categories: Those who are happy with playing music in the style of
> popular musicians from years past (Classical era, Beatles era, Rock era)
> and those who are happy to play in the popular style of the present
> (Pop). I believe those who tried to find new grounds have always been a
> minority, and it likely always was hard, for a variety of reasons.
There is much truth in what you said. However, my initial comment was
about the production sound rather than the musical content itself. Even
if one should want to adhere closely to a certain style in order to gain
an audience, I still don't see how attempting to copy even the
engineering behind the style will benefit anyone.

Cheers,
S.M.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Oct 20 00:15:07 2011