On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 05:13:31PM +0200, Jeremy Jongepier jeremy-at-autostatic.com wrote:
> On 10/19/2011 05:06 PM, Brett McCoy wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Jeremy Jongepier
> > <jeremy@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >> On 10/19/2011 04:45 PM, Brett McCoy wrote:
> >>> My main concern with Jamin these days is whether or not it's being
> >>> actively developed and/or supported... it hasn't been updated in quite
> >>> a while (0.95 came out in 2005, right?).
> >>
> >> It's at 0.97.16, last updated 6 months ago.
> >
> > Maybe I am looking in the wrong place...? All I see on the Jamin
> > website & Sourceforge is 0.95.0
> >
>
> http://jamin.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jamin/jamin/configure.in?view=log
>
> So you have to compile from CVS if you want the latest version.
Why are so many projects going in the direction of never having any
official releases, and requiring everyone to use CVS, SVN, GIT, or
whatever instead? I can understand making their software available to
whoever wants it through those methods, but it seems to me there should
still be official releases that can be counted on to be stable.
Chuck
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Oct 21 12:15:01 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 21 2011 - 12:15:02 EEST