Re: [LAU] Least expensive way to do 30-channel low-latency audio?

From: Giso Grimm <gg3137@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Dec 22 2011 - 09:57:02 EET

On 12/22/2011 06:56 AM, Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:
> What hardware is probably best?

two completely different questions ...

I have a cheap but working solution for up to 26 channels:

cheapest off-shelf AMD Athlon II X2 250 (with on-board nvidia chipset)
3.0.0 lowlatency kernel
RME hdsp9652 (use raydat for more channels)
3*Behringer ADA8000 converters (this is probably the weakest part,
especially the power supply of those, but also phantom power problems
and random noise peaks at some inputs)

Runs with 64 frames/period at 48 kHz without xruns for hours, even at
about 60-70% CPU usage on both cores. Used on stage with 10 inputs and
24 outputs.

Switch *all* cores to maximum clock rate manually (or deactivate
frequency scaling completely).

-- Giso

>
> --
> Jonathan E. Brickman
> /Ponderworthy Music/ <http://ponderworthy.com>
> 805 SW Jewell Ave
> Topeka KS 66606-1610
> jeb@email-addr-hidden <mailto:jeb@email-addr-hidden>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Dec 22 12:15:01 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 22 2011 - 12:15:02 EET