-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:44:21 +0000
Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:50:12AM -0500, Chris Metzler wrote:
>>
>> 2. Some interfaces seem to have a combination jack that allows XLR
>> and 1/4" inputs. Are these good? Or is there a tradeoff between
>> convenience and sound quality?
>
> Sound quality is not determined by the connector. But the use of
> such connectors can indicate 'budget quality'. Very often they are
> used as a combined mic/line input (mic = XLR, line = TRS). Then
> it depends: if the line input is just an attenuator feeding the
> mic input that's not really very good. A real line input does not
> pass via the mic preamp.
How do you find out? This doesn't seem like something they'd go out of
their way to tell you in the product documentation!
>> d) Since guitars aren't at line level, do they need
>> preamplification like microphones do?
>
> Yes. Normally the DI box is connected to a microphone input.
Sorry, does that mean that the levels of the guitar signal upon output
from the DI box are comparable to that of a mic, and thus a mic preamp
associated with a microphone input will do the job? I had it in my
head that you used either (an active DI) or (a passive DI + specialized
guitar preamp) to bring the guitar up to line level, and then plugged
into a line input. If I'm understanding you correctly, another option
is to use a passive DI and plug into a microphone input (assuming the
interface has one). Is that correct?
> Some other things to consider:
>
> Usually you get what you pay for. Quality is not only sound
> quality, but also construction and reliability, and it has
> a price.
Are there particular ways you recommend to find out about that, other
than trolling the list archives for positive/negative comments? I've
had mixed results with trusting customer reviews on vendor sites,
because even if honest, those reviews tend to be posted very soon after
purchase, when what I want is to see how people feel after more
extended use.
> If you are a musician, consider the combination of a simple
> but good quality soundcard having only balanced line inputs
> and outputs (even fixed level) with one the many small
> musician's mixers. These usually have mic and guitar inputs,
> a headphone output etc. Such a combination is much more
> flexible than any soundcard.
Can you elaborate on this a bit more? The mixers I'm familiar with
have a limited number of outputs (since the point of the mixer is to
mix down the signals it's receiving); so if I intended to record
multiple channels simultaneously, I'd lose some post-recording
flexibility (like the ability to manipulate tracks independently in a
DAW) by mixing down before passing the signal to the audio interface.
Or maybe you're not suggesting using the mixer *as a mixer*, but rather
as a mic preamp or guitar preamp for just one of my analog signals
before passing that one signal to the interface? Or do I still not
follow you?
> Ciao,
Thanks very much!
- -c
- --
Chris Metzler cmetzler@email-addr-hidden-me.net
(remove "snip-me." to email)
"As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since
I have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk8I7S0ACgkQEqzZtgaaqqHIdQCeJ3ojX6O7LgjpiwvMQW43jjUR
V00AnixOkTM42j5IbPh7KaSOMxQl4Vlf
=Ts16
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Jan 8 04:15:02 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jan 08 2012 - 04:15:03 EET