Re: [LAU] bitwig announcement

From: hermann <brummer-@web.de>
Date: Mon Jan 16 2012 - 15:27:36 EET

Am Montag, den 16.01.2012, 13:25 +0100 schrieb Jörn Nettingsmeier:
> On 01/15/2012 02:29 PM, hermann wrote:
>
> > Not so long ago, for most people linux was == open source, that gone
> > lost more and more. You didn't need to be a geek to prefer the use of
> > open source tools, that could also lead by sozial or maybe political
> > skills.
> > Today, it becomes harder and harder to found a place were you could talk
> > with people over open source tools. More and more Close Source swap into
> > the Linux world. For me, for example that makes linux more to a 2.
> > windows.
> > The advance of open source is that knowledge gone be a community good.
> > Okay, for a Musician witch just wone use the best tools to make Music,
> > that didn't have any impact, but also musicians could be driven by there
> > political or social state, and for those the place witch could be called
> > "home" is slipped away.
>
> this argument works both ways: for professional users, all that counts
> is the availability of the tools required for a particular job. if i can
> get a closed-source tool (rather than none at all), that enables me to
> _stick_ with linux and not have to run a brown-paper-bag headless
> windows box in my basement that needlessly heats up my wine storage and
> irritates my router.
>
> i'm pretty sure there is nothing to fear from choice, ever.
>
> it's interesting to observe the (minor) frictions that arise when people
> who are coming from a proprietary operating system (who have certain
> user experience expectations and some degree of ignorance of how the
> open source community works) suddenly adopt open-source tools. i
> remember the tricks paul used to pretty much drive ardour-osx users into
> IRC at gunpoint - without these tricks, mac users tended to double-click
> on an installer, run into a problem, walk away complaining and were
> never seen again... this is probably also the reason why there's isn't a
> windows version of ardour (yet) - you got to backport the software, but
> you also got to forward-port user attitude, which can be a lot less
> tractable.
>
> in the bitwig case, the problem is much simpler: a proprietary tool
> enters an open-source ecosystem. it removes one more hurdle for people
> with a certain workflow to adopt (or stay with) linux.
> those who don't like it don't use it. the only friction point arises
> when those who don't like it tell others why they shouldn't be using it.
> _______________________________________________

I didn't tell others what they have to do or not, I just say that I
didn't like and use Close Source, and why I choose so.

I guess that is free to me also.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Jan 16 16:15:03 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 16 2012 - 16:15:03 EET