On 05/26/2012 03:47 AM, Len Ovens wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 3:28 pm, Louis Gorenfeld wrote:
>> I might, but there's also limited time I have to improve it. I guess
>> it depends on how in-demand it'd be, and how much I'd have to
>> rearrange existing code. I'd hoped VST support on Linux would be doing
>> well in general, but maybe that's not the case..?
>
> VST is one of those things that sits odd in some parts of the Linux
> community. It is not GPL, it is an owned spec. So while the average audio
> user might like to have a VST plug in. There are some Distributions that
> will not ship with either VST plugins, VST containers or VST support. It
> also means some of the people who do a lot of audio coding and maintain
> binary packages don't care too much about about improving VST support.
Wondering, maybe there could be such a thing as an LV2 "plugin" that
could function as a wrapper around a VST plugin????
-- David gnome@email-addr-hidden authenticity, honesty, community http://clanjones.org/david/ http://dancing-treefrog.deviantart.com/ _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Sun May 27 00:15:04 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun May 27 2012 - 00:15:05 EEST