Re: [LAU] Box under £400

On 05/30/2012 09:21 AM, Sciss wrote:
> thanks for the link and the info. so you think atom processors are
> fine enough? the latency actually doesn't matter in my case. i'm more
> worried that i'm going to through a lot of CPU heavy stuff on it, as
> this will run experimental software I wrote myself (and I won't have
> any time for performance tuning of the software itself).

I have an Atom N450 netbook. In practical terms, its limits for a
single task are:

   * Time-stretching a clip in realtime to 50% to original
     time span.

   * A set with 4-5 monophonic synths, and 4-5 pure audio
     tracks.

   * All of the Renoise sample programs

   * Most anything you can throw at Mixxx.

While it has very good audio performance -- it has significantly less
headroom than a Core2 or i-series processor (feels like a factor of 2 or 4).

Other non-audio tasks:

   * Large compiles take 4-6x longer (e.g. kernel, Qt)

   * Number crunching tasks are very slow. It's like the
     floating point stuff is driving drunk.

   * Processor has a high performance hit for inefficient
     memory access (compared to Core2, i-series).

   * Processor doesn't benefit as much from SIMD (SSE)
     optimizations. E.g. you're lucky to get a 2x performance
     boost using SIMD instructions... whereas a Core2 or i-series
     will see at least a 2x performance boost.

   * Most Atom devices have only 1GB RAM (2GB if you're lucky).
     I've not seen an Atom device with more then 2GB.

Finally, all this experience is in 32-bit mode. I've been running in
64-bit mode recently, but haven't done much audio with it. Overall, it
feels about the same.

-gabriel
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu May 31 12:15:01 2012