Re: [LAU] klang

From: Thomas Vecchione <seablaede@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Aug 02 2012 - 17:28:13 EEST

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Patrick Shirkey
<pshirkey@email-addr-hiddenwrote:

>
> IMO Paul was right to come out full guns blazing on this one. After all
> the effort that has gone into making Linux the most stable audio platform
> over the years it is very dubious behaviour for this person to come out of
> the blue with a direct challenge to the platform without even having the
> courtesy to discuss it first in the LAD list.
>
>
You misunderstood my comment. I have absolutely no issue with how Paul
responded, and he and I talked about it a little on #ardour even but
honestly I agree with him in pretty much every regard and trust that he
knows more about it and can comment on it far more throughly than I ever
could.

My issue, was with the exact comment that was quoted by Oon-Ee, which was
little more than trolling, and Oon-Ee was correct in his assesment in my
opinion. However I just wanted to clarify where the comment Oon-Ee qutoed
came from, which was from the Phoronix thread, not from any mailing list
thread so it was obviously confusing what was trying to be said as some
people thought it was directed to them when it wasn't.

The rest of your post has been pretty well addressed by others I believe so
I will leave that alone:)

          Seablade

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Aug 2 20:15:03 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 02 2012 - 20:15:03 EEST