Re: [LAU] klang

On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:51:11 -0400
Brett McCoy <idragosani@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Joe Hartley <jh@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:19:02 +0200 (CEST)
> > "Patrick Shirkey" <pshirkey@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> IMO Paul was right to come out full guns blazing on this one. After all
> >> the effort that has gone into making Linux the most stable audio platform
> >> over the years it is very dubious behaviour for this person to come out of
> >> the blue with a direct challenge to the platform without even having the
> >> courtesy to discuss it first in the LAD list.
> >
> > I found it odd that the klang developer has this thing for power management.
> > My studio machine is not a laptop running on battery power, nor does it
> > have a heat problem. I really couldn't care less about whether my audio
> > subsystem allows the CPU to throttle back. My latency is around 5ms, and I
> > don't have any problem with routing apps through JACK. My studio system
> > has been very stable for years now.
>
> AFAIK, if you have your cpu governor set to 'performance', you
> shouldn't have an issue with frequency scaling anyway. I have so much
> stuff consuming power in my studio as it is, I doubt Jack is going to
> make that much of an impact on it. :-)

What I find extremely disappointing about all of this is that we are not
exactly over-endowed with developers. Without casting stones in any directions
this entire issue is a waste of talent and potential advancement.

-- 
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user