On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 19:27:59 +0200, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 19:21 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:06:22 +0200, James Harkins <jamshark70@email-addr-hidden>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> From: "Kaj Ailomaa"
>> >> To make linux-lowlatency default, I'd just not install linux-generic
>> at
>> >> all.
>> >
>> > Maybe overkill: grub-customizer lets you choose whichever installed
>> > kernel you want to be the default.
>> >
>>
>> Not overkill, since -lowlatency is a -generic, but with a different
>> configuration. Why keep -generic, if you don't need it for anything?
>
> Or else
>
> - you simply edit grub.cfg manually, as I did
> - you switch to grub legacy, as I did and edit menu.lst manually as I do
>
> :p
>
> Why making things unneeded complicated?
>
> Regards,
> Ralf
>
I was just pointing out why deciding boot order between kernels may be
unneeded, if keeping -generic and -lowlatency on the same machine, as they
are more or less the same kernel.
Don't see how editing files manually, and installing legacy software makes
things complicated compared to doing nothing at all.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Aug 22 00:15:02 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 22 2012 - 00:15:03 EEST